August 31, 2008
Our friends finally made it up here for the weekend, despite the best efforts of Virgin Rail to prevent them. This morning we were debating what to do during their last few hours as the rain went from ‘it looks like it might be getting brighter out there’ to ‘nope it’s really pissing down now’ and back.
One of our guests got onto the internet and checked out the forecast:
Friend: Sunday – rain
Me: Oh dear, probably not a walk then.
Friend: Monday – rain
Me: Oh, shame. Oh well.
Friend: Tuesday – rain
Me: I’m beginning to get the picture, thanks
Friend: Wednesday – rain
Me: yes, you can stop now, thanks
Friend: Thursday – rain
Thank God they’re only five day forecasts, eh?
August 28, 2008
I spend far too much time reading cycling blogs so I’ve only got myself to blame for a growing obsession with the numbers. Or rather, one particular number and in this perhaps GOM1 of Tlatet shares some of the blame because he was the one who introduced me to it: the Eddington Number.
The Eddington Number is defined as E, the number of days a cyclist has cycled more than E miles – Eddington himself had an E number of 87, i.e. he had ridden at least 87 miles on 87 separate days in his lifetime. Now according to Map My Ride, another obsession of mine, the trip down to papershop village and back is just over 11 miles, and I’ve easily done 11 or more of them so my E number (discounting all rides taken before I moved up here because I’ve no idea how long they were) is a pathetic 11, and (and this is the killer with Eddington numbers) no matter how many more times I cycle down there and back it’s not going to get any higher either. So I’m forced to find longer rides, and keep lengthening them if I want to see the number improve. Which, curiously enough, I do. I don’t care how fast I go, how many calories I allegedly burn (MMR has a fairly random approach to calories burnt, in my experience) or anything like that but I’d like to have a better value for E
So today, I worked out a different route to Papershop Village, one I’m dubbing the masochist’s papershop run. Not only is it 3 miles longer than the shortest route, it goes over several highly unnecessary hills. This time I did at least remember to check out the contour lines before I set off, although I was using an old map and airily assumed that the elevations were in feet, not metres*. The end result was 14.5 miles in 1 hour and *cough* quite a lot of minutes, and I only had to get off the bike and push once, when I had slowed down to look at a topiary bird placed out way in the middle of nowhere, and failed to get enough momentum for the vertical climb that was round the bend. I saw buzzards and wheatears (bringing my birds I have positively identified from the bike list up to 7) and a squashed weasel (bringing my squashed animals on the road list up to 5), and precisely no cars until I got almost into the village itself and encountered a prat in a jag holding his racing line round a bend despite the fact that this meant going over into my side of the road (bringing my arseholes behind the wheel list up to 394).
Numbers, numbers, numbers – I love them. I’m thinking of starting a spreadsheet now, just to keep track. What do you measure? And what is your highest value for E?
*I was wrong.
August 27, 2008
So I was down at Papershop Village having been beaten to the shop counter by a little girl. She was about six or seven, the age when, if you believe what you read in the papers, kids spend their entire lives strapped into 4x4s being ferried from one social engagement to another, so it was kind of nice to see her out on her own, excited to be going to the shop and spending her own money*. And so I didn’t really fret as she rushed about choosing her selection of goodies and counting her change, nor when she hovered in a delicious agony of indecision over which flavour of Fruitellas to buy, nor even when she darted off at the last minute to rummage around for the last of the 20p bag of sweeties. Nor, indeed did I fret, much – although perhaps the indulgent smile was wearing thin a little at the edges – when she realised she didn’t have enough money for her purchases and had to select which ones to put back, with much humming and hawing at the thought.
‘You’re very patient,’ the shopkeeper said when she had skipped out and I finally plunked down my 80p for my paper. In London, of course, I’d just have gone over her head, in the unlikely event that a six-year-old could have beaten me to the counter in the first place. But you know what? I didn’t have a train to catch, and haven’t had one for a very long time. ‘No rush,’ I said, and it was true. I only need to know the time these days when I’ve got something in the oven. And even then, with a Rayburn, a few minutes extra here or there don’t hurt. No rush, no rush.
I think I may have to go to London soon, just to re-stress a bit. Becuase if I get any more relaxed here, you’ll have to scrape me off the floor with a spoon.
*At least I hope it was her own.
August 26, 2008
In a break in the weather yesterday the other half & I took the chance to go and see whether there were dipper at the waterfall, our principal pastime when checking the level of water in the ford has got old (see also: looking to see if the cottage that sells eggs has any eggs). The evening before we’d had a treat: a dipper had shown up and spent a good ten or fifteen minutes diving into the water off rocks and bringing up larvae to eat. This time, however, the other half had brought his big bird-scaring camera so the dipper wasn’t there, and we just stood and watched the water crashing down the waterfall instead.
And then suddenly we saw a fish: there and gone before I could even register it, right in the middle of the waterfall’s flow. I thought I’d imagined it until we saw another, and, after we had waited for a while, another and another and another. Salmon leaping up waterfalls is something I’ve read about, but until you see it, it’s hard to describe just how surreal and fundamentally unlikely the whole thing is. The waterfall in question isn’t all that high, probably about 20 feet in total. But compared to even the biggest salmon, it’s enormous, and there’s a boiling maelstrom of water at the bottom and more rapids to negotiate at the top. As we could see was the fish appearing, still pumping frantically with its tail, to glint in the light before it disappeared into the churning white water again. I don’t even know if any of them made it to the top.
I’d post a photograph, but all you’d get would be a picture of a waterfall where a few seconds before there had been a fish but there wasn’t one anymore. Maybe I’ll go down there again with a tripod and set up a timelapse and see if we don’t get lucky. Meanwhile, you’ll just have to believe me. I tell you, it was this big …
August 25, 2008
And how was your Bank Holiday Weekend?
August 22, 2008
When shopping at Big Town’s monster Tescos, the other half & I have a favourite trolley that we seek out on every trip. Now, wait – before you mock, there is some logic in this. The trolley in question is an M&S trolley & quite what it’s doing so far from its nearest home, I have no idea. But we like it because it is possible to wheel it in a straight line. This may partly be due to some superior M&S build quality (not just steel but hand mined Andean steel, rolled on the thighs of Peruvian virgins…) but is primarily because Tescos have crippled all of their trolleys with a gadget that is intended to stop you wheeling it out of the carpark and chucking it into the nearest canal, but tends to activate itself somewhere between the fresh fruit and veg and the frozen foods. If we don’t get the M&S trolley the whole trip is spent dragging a recalcitrant trolley out of side aisles and preventing it from swerving into little old ladies’ legs so that if you didn’t want to chuck it into the canal when you started, you do by the end. So we prowl the carpark until we find our favourite trolley, usually tucked at the back of the trolley shelter, full of litter, and if we find it, it’s just one of those small pleasures in life that keep the days ticking over. OK, now you may mock.
But anyway, some days ago we were spotted by the trolley man as we wheeled our contraband trolley towards the shop. ‘Hang on,’ he said, ‘you’ve got the wrong trolley! That’s a Marks & Spencer trolley! Let me get you a proper one. We just use that one for putting the litter in.’ ‘Nooo!’ we cried, clutching our trolley to ourselves before he could grab it. ‘We like this one! Your trolleys are rubbish, this one works.’ ‘Fair enough,’ he said, and we thought no more about it.
Fools that we were. Because we should have noticed the jobsworth gleam in the trolley man’s eyes. People were using the Wrong Trolley! They actively preferred the Wrong Trolley. Use of the Wrong Trolley Must Be Stopped.
And lo and behold, when the other half went back last night to pick up some bits, our favourite trolley had gone. It’s back to dragging the limping Tescos trolleys around again, and the little old ladies be damned. Unless … unless we can do a dawn raid on the town centre’s M&S and liberate our trolley once more.
August 21, 2008
There was much triumphant reportage in the paper the other day about how the highways agency is stopping any roadworks over the bank holiday because it has noticed that there tends to be heavier than normal traffic at those times, and coning off half the road network is not helpful. Sadly the news does not seem to have trickled down to Network Rail. We have – at least I hope we still have – friends planning to visit for the bank holiday weekend. Being organised, they booked their tickets well in advance. At the time, the sole interruption to their journey was the need to change at Watford Junction, adding no more than half an hour to their journey home. Not bad, in these rail replacement times.
Fast forward to now, and the situation has changed. Minor works around Watford Junction have turned into a mighty engineering extravaganza. Their four hour journey home has become eight hours, via Newcastle and across the Pennines. Can they at least book seats on the train from Newcastle? They cannot, because the East Coast train is chocka with the entire luvvie population of London returning from the Edinburgh festival. Can they book seats on the train going up? They cannot, at least not on the internet and not by phone and when my friend makes the trek to Charing Cross station to do it in person the only response is ‘computer says no’. What are her options? Well, she can drive on the newly re-opened Highways Agency roads. Or she can fly. Or she can resign herself to eight plus hours of travelling, crammed in next to the toilet on a National Express train on a clockwise tour of Britain. ‘Or,’ says the helpful man on the phone, ‘you could wait until the engineering works are over and travel then!’ When might that be? ‘September the 6th.’
They said back in July that we’ve got 100 months to save the planet. If August is anything to go by, we haven’t exactly got off to a great start.